Distributed: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "== Synopsis == Slashdot has a quite geeky use base, it might be supposed, that a lot of them would be willing to use a browser plugin to access Altslashdot, if the incentive w...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Technology == | == Technology == | ||
There is some discussion about a relevant technology already. See e.g. [http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110512/02063714244/could-bittorrent-be-distributed-social-network-people-have-been-clamoring.shtml| Could BitTorrent Be The Distributed Social Network People Have Been Clamoring For?]. In fact, a rudimentary technology that would serve a static site exists already, e.g. [http://forum.bittorrent.com/topic/17182-idea-btsync-based-web-sites| btsync based web sites]. | |||
Surely, a lot od development would be needed. But the upside would be, that Altslashdot would be independent on businesses, dependent on users -- a good thing, as it would serve only the latter. | |||
Revision as of 13:51, 7 February 2014
Synopsis
Slashdot has a quite geeky use base, it might be supposed, that a lot of them would be willing to use a browser plugin to access Altslashdot, if the incentive would be save the community, disable ads etc. Still, a centralised webhosting would be needed, e.g. to attract novices or to support rare browsers.
The idea is, that if a lot of users use a bittorrent--style decentralised hosting, running the centralised web server would be cheap enough to life off donations.
Technology
There is some discussion about a relevant technology already. See e.g. Could BitTorrent Be The Distributed Social Network People Have Been Clamoring For?. In fact, a rudimentary technology that would serve a static site exists already, e.g. btsync based web sites.
Surely, a lot od development would be needed. But the upside would be, that Altslashdot would be independent on businesses, dependent on users -- a good thing, as it would serve only the latter.