Style:Typography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Font style will have implications on perceived line widths, as stunted fonts versus tall fonts produce a different overhead whitespace. | * Font style will have implications on perceived line widths, as stunted fonts versus tall fonts produce a different overhead whitespace. | ||
See [http://http://www.pearsonified.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/line-height-vs-line-width.png Line Height versus Line Width] at pearsonified.com for a thumbnail guide to font size / line height selection. | See [http://http://www.pearsonified.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/line-height-vs-line-width.png Line Height versus Line Width] at pearsonified.com for a thumbnail guide to font size / line height selection. | ||
* | * The same website provides a calculator: | ||
See [http://www.pearsonified.com/typography/ Typography Calculator] | |||
Revision as of 03:56, 29 March 2014
Golden Ratio of Proportionality
This resource is summarised for our purposes here and pertains to Line length, Line height and Font Size:
- The Golden Ratio is approximately = 1.618
- Line height increases with increasing font size, and increasing line length.
- Landscape view has long line lengths
- Portrait view has short line lengths
- The screen orientation should be sensed to determine optimal line width: use media queries.
- Font style will have implications on perceived line widths, as stunted fonts versus tall fonts produce a different overhead whitespace.
See Line Height versus Line Width at pearsonified.com for a thumbnail guide to font size / line height selection.
- The same website provides a calculator: