Talk:Server Architecture: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Automated deployment == | == Automated deployment == | ||
Whatever provider is used, I recommend starting with an automated deployment from the beginning. It's a lot easier than incorporating it later and you'll thank me when you grow. Puppet is easier to work with unless you are already familiar with Chef. --[[User:Dean1012|Dean1012]] ([[User talk:Dean1012|talk]]) 20:17, 20 February 2014 (MST) | Whatever provider is used, I recommend starting with an automated deployment from the beginning. It's a lot easier than incorporating it later and you'll thank me when you grow. Puppet is easier to work with unless you are already familiar with Chef. --[[User:Dean1012|Dean1012]] ([[User talk:Dean1012|talk]]) 20:17, 20 February 2014 (MST) | ||
:I don't disagree. New infrastructure will be rolled out with tools, not by hand. That's part of the reason why the Management servers are in there. I'm a big fan of Puppet and Ansible myself [[User:Zford|Zford]] ([[User talk:Zford|talk]]) 21:31, 20 February 2014 (MST) | |||
Revision as of 04:31, 21 February 2014
Potential DNS Providers
- https://web.gratisdns.dk/ (Free up to 5 domains)
- http://www.zoneedit.com/ (Paid)
- http://dyn.com/secondary-dns/ (Paid, but pretty good reputation)
Re: DNS providers
I don't know if this is the right place to add this, but i can host secondary DNS (or primary as well if necessary)
sidd
Automated deployment
Whatever provider is used, I recommend starting with an automated deployment from the beginning. It's a lot easier than incorporating it later and you'll thank me when you grow. Puppet is easier to work with unless you are already familiar with Chef. --Dean1012 (talk) 20:17, 20 February 2014 (MST)